From pycyn@aol.com Thu Oct 11 17:49:42 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0); 12 Oct 2001 00:49:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 44579 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2001 00:49:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 12 Oct 2001 00:49:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r04.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.100) by mta2 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2001 00:49:41 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.8.) id r.9c.148f5e45 (3926) for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 20:49:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <9c.148f5e45.28f79820@aol.com> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 20:49:36 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Logical language To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_9c.148f5e45.28f79820_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra --part1_9c.148f5e45.28f79820_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 10/11/2001 5:59:39 PM Central Daylight Time, xod@sixgirls.org writes: > You're right. The principals have been arguing for at least a week now > whether "le broda" is a sumti or a bridi. They certainly can't be expected > to discuss logic using Lojban. > Well, there are a number of problems with talking about Logic in Lojban at the present (lack of vocabulary, complexity of required constructions, difficulty in quoting forms -- nobody does MEX well, and so on), but so far as I can tell, no one believes that {le broda} is a bridi and certainly no one sems to have argued that it is. Not that that aprticular issue would affect a discussion of Logic much. --part1_9c.148f5e45.28f79820_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 10/11/2001 5:59:39 PM Central Daylight Time, xod@sixgirls.org writes:


You're right. The principals have been arguing for at least a week now
whether "le broda" is a sumti or a bridi. They certainly can't be expected
to discuss logic using Lojban.

Well, there are a number of problems with talking about Logic in Lojban at the present (lack of vocabulary, complexity of required constructions, difficulty in quoting forms -- nobody does MEX well, and so on), but so far as I can tell, no one believes that {le broda} is a bridi and certainly no one sems to have argued that it is.  Not that that aprticular issue would affect a discussion of Logic much.
--part1_9c.148f5e45.28f79820_boundary--