From pycyn@aol.com Sun Oct 14 07:49:00 2001
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 14 Oct 2001 14:48:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 47326 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2001 14:48:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 14 Oct 2001 14:48:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m05.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.8)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 14 Oct 2001 14:48:59 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-m05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.8.) id r.132.30742dd (18709)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 10:48:52 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <132.30742dd.28faffd3@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 10:48:51 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: How do you feel about this new usage?
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_132.30742dd.28faffd3_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535
From: pycyn@aol.com

--part1_132.30742dd.28faffd3_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 10/12/2001 10:02:20 PM Central Daylight Time, 
xod@sixgirls.org writes:


> . i think you're
> > really trying to say "x1 x2 dunli/simsa le ka parbi". the
> > tanru/lujvo just sort of abbreviates that.
> 
> 
> 
> This is an approximation of the English phrase "inasmuch as". Their truth
> values are proprotional. Since all truth values are in [0, 1], I could
> have just as well used bare dunli.
> 
> Also, x1 and x2 are jezbroda, of course. And instead of le ka parbi, it
> could be le ni ce'u jetnu
> 

I don't see how any of this means "inasmuch as," which I tend to equaate 
with the inferential "since." Bare {dunli} would suggest that they have the 
same truth values, as would adding {le ni ce'u jetnu}. So, what does 
"proportional" mean and how is it related to either givens or causes?

--part1_132.30742dd.28faffd3_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 10/12/2001 10:02:20 PM Central Daylight Time, xod@sixgirls.org writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">. &nbsp;i think you're
<BR>&gt; really trying to say "x1 x2 dunli/simsa le ka parbi". &nbsp;the
<BR>&gt; tanru/lujvo just sort of abbreviates that.
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>This is an approximation of the English phrase "inasmuch as". Their truth
<BR>values are proprotional. Since all truth values are in [0, 1], I could
<BR>have just as well used bare dunli.
<BR>
<BR>Also, x1 and x2 are jezbroda, of course. And instead of le ka parbi, it
<BR>could be le ni ce'u jetnu
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>I don't see how any of this means "inasmuch as," &nbsp;which I tend to equaate with the inferential "since." &nbsp;Bare {dunli} would suggest that they have the same truth values, as would adding {le ni ce'u jetnu}. &nbsp;So, what does "proportional" mean and how is it related to either givens or causes?</FONT></HTML>

--part1_132.30742dd.28faffd3_boundary--

