From cmeclax@gmx.co.uk Sun Oct 14 17:58:57 2001
Return-Path: <cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com>
X-Sender: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 15 Oct 2001 00:58:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 3895 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2001 00:58:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 15 Oct 2001 00:58:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (216.189.29.242)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2001 00:58:43 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 504)
  id 2C8673C569; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 20:51:30 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Reply-To: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: da ce de ce di
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 20:51:26 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01101420512601.05275@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com
From: cmeclax po'u le cmevi'u ke'umri <cmeclax@gmx.co.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

How do we distinguish among these sets:
{da, de, di}
{da, {de, di}}
{{da, de}, di}?

jbofi'e interprets "da ce de ce di" as {{da, de}, di}, which seems to me to 
leave no way to say {da, de, di}.

cmeclax
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7yjMQBETrxUjAxlERAod5AJwOAXKVn5KMAH+q5Fqnj7cBznEkMQCfYCXH
BEvCZ1mzZ/24lUxQb73GT7M=
=PWRC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----