Subject: Re: [lojban] da ce de ce di

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 22:16:44 -0400 (EDT)

cmeclax po'u le cmevi'u ke'umri scripsit:

> jbofi'e interprets "da ce de ce di" as {{da, de}, di}, which seems to me to 
> leave no way to say {da, de, di}.

The *parse* of da ce de ce di is (da ce de) ce di, but that is not the
set-theoretic interpretation, which is {da, de, di}. To say anything
else, you have to use explicit set-forming selbri.

-- 
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email-masked]
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan