Subject: krinu, logji and Reason (was: Re: [lojban] if lojban is logical, why are we doing the Bible?

From: And Rosta <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:12:17 +0100

Bjoern:
#On Wednesday 17 October 2001 08:30, [email-masked] wrote:
#> the Bible is a great source of irrationality today. from gay bashers
[...]
#religious belief is no more rational or irrational than atheist scientism.i 
#would consider it rather unintelligent to hold religion in low esteem. there 
#has to be a reason that the largest part of the world population attaches to 
#some creed or another. you err if you think there is no truth beyond 
#science.

Here's an interesting point of semantics. When tinkit says religious belief
is irrational he does not mean there is no reason why the largest part of the 
world population attaches to some creed or another. (My view is that religious disposition is, like male sexuality, a hardwired genetically-
determined variety of madness.) So {da krinu ro nu lijda so'i remna fa da }. 
So how *do* we express the opinion that religious beliefs are irrational? {ro lijda no da se logji }? That's my best shot.

--And.