From xod@sixgirls.org Thu Oct 18 11:51:30 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 18 Oct 2001 18:51:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 72644 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2001 18:51:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 18 Oct 2001 18:51:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta1 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2001 18:51:26 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f9IIpPx26181 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:51:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:51:24 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: if lojban is logical, why are we doing the Bible? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, And Rosta wrote: > Xod to tinkit: > #.i mi tugni le du'u ko darlu bau la lojban > > I read that as: > > "Cause me to agree with each of certain propositions according to which you argue in Lojban" > > I think Xod means something more like: > > ie ko darlu bau la lojban > > No? Better: .i mi tugni le du'u do .ei darlu bau la lojban But, isn't an argument where people (try to) get the others to agree? So the original interpretation ("Cause me to agree with each of certain propositions according to which you argue in Lojban") isn't so bad after all. -- It's said that Mullah Omar has met two non-Muslims in his life. Others say even that's not true. Sami ul-Haq, Osama bin Laden's closest friend in Pakistan, runs the "University for the Education of Truth," a fundamentalist institution that educated and trained nine out of the Taliban's top 10 leaders.