From thinkit8@lycos.com Thu Oct 18 16:21:37 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: thinkit8@lycos.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 18 Oct 2001 23:21:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 67044 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2001 23:21:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.1.220 with QMQP; 18 Oct 2001 23:21:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n15.groups.yahoo.com) (10.1.1.31) by mta1 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2001 23:21:36 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: thinkit8@lycos.com Received: from [10.1.2.28] by n15.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Oct 2001 23:21:33 -0000 Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 23:21:33 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: binary cmavo Message-ID: <9qno5t+8pfd@eGroups.com> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 530 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 24.5.121.32 From: thinkit8@lycos.com X-Yahoo-Profile: thinkit41 i propose two cmavo dedicated to the binary digits 0 and 1. thus every time you use them, you have to mean the number to be taken as binary. they would fit fine in the PA selma'o. also, they would mix with the other numbers to create implied mixed-base numbers. especially useful in areas that use a power of 2, but also valid in duodecimal or decimal areas. any comments? i'd like them to be monosyballic, but that may be too much to ask. i'll have to look carefully so we don't have another rei/xei problem again.