Subject: Re: [lojban] a construal of lo'e & le'e

From: "Adam Raizen" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 12:28:19 -0000

la rab.spir. cusku di'e

> I think the misuse of {da} to mean "something", without considering
the
> logical implications, is much more dangerous than using the wrong
> article. I'd say about half the time someone says {da} they really
mean
> {zu'i}.

"zu'i" implies "da", doesn't it?

mu'o mi'e .adam.