From rob@twcny.rr.com Sun Oct 28 19:01:09 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 29 Oct 2001 03:01:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 26077 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2001 03:01:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 29 Oct 2001 03:01:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailout6.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.177) by mta2 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2001 03:01:08 -0000 Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-0 [24.92.226.74]) by mailout6.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/Road Runner 1.12) with ESMTP id f9T309F16450 for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 22:00:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from riff ([24.92.246.4]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 22:00:07 -0500 Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15y2eu-0000Qf-00 for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 22:00:16 -0500 Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 22:00:16 -0500 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] a construal of lo'e & le'e Message-ID: <20011028220016.B1607@twcny.rr.com> Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com References: <20011028025343.A2376@twcny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com From: Rob Speer X-Yahoo-Profile: squeekybobo On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 10:06:02AM -0500, John Cowan wrote: > > {pa stedu cu stedu ro remna}? > > {pazu'i stedu ro remna}? (My understanding of zu'i is that this is > > equivalent to the previous one.) > > Those both work, and indeed better, for "ponse" is not truly appropriate. > We don't *own* our heads (and carry them about in our briefcases!); we > *have* heads. This is what John said which contradicts what And said. -- la rab.spir noi sarji zo gumri