Subject: Re: [lojban] a construal of lo'e & le'e

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 22:22:51 -0500 (EST)

Rob Speer scripsit:

> On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 10:06:02AM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> > > {pa stedu cu stedu ro remna}?
> > > {pazu'i stedu ro remna}? (My understanding of zu'i is that this is
> > > equivalent to the previous one.)
> > 
> > Those both work, and indeed better, for "ponse" is not truly appropriate.
> > We don't *own* our heads (and carry them about in our briefcases!); we
> > *have* heads.
> 
> This is what John said which contradicts what And said.

I was quite wrong to say these work; I was too concerned with the point
about stedu rather than ponse as the selbri, and missed the quantifier
order!

-- 
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email-masked]
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan