From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Mon Oct 29 08:55:06 2001
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 29 Oct 2001 16:55:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 69915 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2001 16:55:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by 10.1.1.220 with QMQP; 29 Oct 2001 16:55:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2001 16:55:05 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
  Mon, 29 Oct 2001 16:31:41 +0000
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
  with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 17:06:07 +0000
Message-Id: <sbdd8c7f.057@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 17:05:52 +0000
To: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] a construal of lo'e & le'e
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

Rob wrote:
> Is it not true that if you use {da} in one sentence and again in
> another, without using {da'o}, it refers to the same thing?
>=20
> For example, is this correct?
> {.i reda cu kanla mi .i da blanu}

I replied "yes"

pc replied:=20
#Officially not,=20

pc is right. I was wrong (due to focusing on a different issue).

--And.