From ragnarok@pobox.com Mon Oct 29 18:32:04 2001
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 30 Oct 2001 02:32:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 31263 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2001 02:32:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by 10.1.1.223 with QMQP; 30 Oct 2001 02:32:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2001 02:32:03 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.98] by intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-5.05) id A12771B40284; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 21:32:07 -0500
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Moss and lichen
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 21:25:26 -0500
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFOEKLCEAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <0110292124000H.01133@neofelis>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
X-Yahoo-Profile: xreig

>There is a gismu {clika} which is glossed as moss or lichen. Which is it?
The
>two are completely different and are not even in the same kingdom. voc
gives

I'd go with Moss, since it is definable as one organism. Lichen is two in
symbiosis, and it thus less useful for taxonomy, which I know is what you
are using it for.