From ragnarok@pobox.com Tue Oct 30 03:40:50 2001
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 30 Oct 2001 11:40:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 24571 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2001 11:40:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by 10.1.1.221 with QMQP; 30 Oct 2001 11:40:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2001 11:40:49 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.98] by intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-5.05) id A1C997D000AE; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 06:40:57 -0500
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Moss and lichen
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 06:34:15 -0500
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFOEKMCEAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <0110292141520I.01133@neofelis>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
X-Yahoo-Profile: xreig

>> I'd go with Moss, since it is definable as one organism. Lichen is two in
>> symbiosis, and it thus less useful for taxonomy, which I know is what you
>> are using it for.

>But if it is moss, what do we call lichen? And if it is lichen, what do we
>call moss? Besides, lichens are classified taxonomically; they are mostly
>ascomycetes, IIRR. They are classified by the fungus component.

That's insane! But how about: Lichen = rokci clika; Moss = spatykai clika