From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Tue Oct 30 06:49:29 2001
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 30 Oct 2001 14:49:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 89311 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2001 14:49:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 30 Oct 2001 14:49:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2001 14:49:28 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
  Tue, 30 Oct 2001 14:25:53 +0000
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
  with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 15:00:24 +0000
Message-Id: <sbdec088.032@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 14:59:49 +0000
To: pycyn <pycyn@aol.com>, lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] a construal of lo'e & le'e
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

>>> <pycyn@aol.com> 10/29/01 09:43pm >>>
#jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:
#> I am not commenting on the lo'e/le'e construal because I agree
#> with it completely.
#
#With whose version, and if with And's, can you explain it, please? (The l=
ast=20
#round he said that {lo'e broda} was abstract but did not have properties t=
hat=20
#no broda had!)=20

My mistake, if I said that. No, I don't think {lo'e broda} is abstract on t=
he=20
construal I proposed for it.

--And.