From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Tue Oct 30 12:16:49 2001
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 30 Oct 2001 20:16:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 64902 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2001 20:16:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by 10.1.1.220 with QMQP; 30 Oct 2001 20:16:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2001 20:16:49 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
  Tue, 30 Oct 2001 19:53:23 +0000
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
  with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:27:55 +0000
Message-Id: <sbdf0d4b.061@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:27:33 +0000
To: pycyn <pycyn@aol.com>, lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] SE--FA interaction
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

for sumti tails SE-conversion is mandatory & hence revaluation of FA
is unavoidable.

>>> <pycyn@aol.com> 10/30/01 07:06pm >>>
In a message dated 10/30/2001 10:04:07 AM Central Standard Time,=20
arosta@uclan.ac.uk writes:


> AFAICR, FA numbering applies to the OUTPUT of SE conversion. Is this=20
> correct? It would be easier if FA numbering were unaffected by SE=20
> conversion.
>=20

Yes, because SE creates a new predicate and it is the places of that=20
predicate that are numbered. If you want FA unaffected by SE, just don't u=
se=20
SE -- you can then put anything anywhere you want it. Otherwise, what is t=
he=20
point -- or advantage?