From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Tue Oct 30 13:00:52 2001
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 30 Oct 2001 21:00:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 81516 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2001 21:00:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by 10.1.1.223 with QMQP; 30 Oct 2001 21:00:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2001 21:00:51 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
  Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:37:30 +0000
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
  with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 21:12:00 +0000
Message-Id: <sbdf17a0.096@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 21:11:47 +0000
To: "jay.kominek" <jay.kominek@colorado.edu>, lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] SE--FA interaction
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

What I mean is that there is no alternative to "le se broda" if=20
you want to get at the ur-x2 of broda.

I'd be happy to find I was wrong.


>>> Jay Kominek <jay.kominek@colorado.edu> 10/30/01 08:22pm >>>

On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, And Rosta wrote:

> for sumti tails SE-conversion is mandatory & hence revaluation of FA
> is unavoidable.

Mandatory?

{broda be fo do} is a valid sumti-tail.

I make regular use of that.

- Jay Kominek <jay.kominek@colorado.edu>
Plus +=BAa change, plus c'est la m+*me chose



To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com=20

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/=20




