From jay.kominek@colorado.edu Tue Oct 30 13:51:58 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 30 Oct 2001 21:51:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 92491 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2001 21:51:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 30 Oct 2001 21:51:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucsub.colorado.edu) (128.138.129.12) by mta1 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2001 21:51:54 -0000 Received: from ucsub.colorado.edu (kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu [128.138.129.12]) by ucsub.colorado.edu (8.11.6/8.11.2/ITS-5.0/student) with ESMTP id f9ULpow14898 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 14:51:50 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 14:51:50 -0700 (MST) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] SE--FA interaction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE From: Jay Kominek X-Yahoo-Profile: jfkominek On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, And Rosta wrote: > What I mean is that there is no alternative to "le se broda" if > you want to get at the ur-x2 of broda. I don't see what can be wrong with "se broda". How can you get shorter than a monosyllabic cmavo + the bridi? (Short of maybe allocating some monosyllabic cmavo to be combinations of "le+SE", which would be silly.) - Jay Kominek Plus =C3=A7a change, plus c'est la m=C3=AAme chose