Subject: Re: [lojban] SE--FA interaction

From: Jay Kominek <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 14:51:50 -0700 (MST)

On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, And Rosta wrote:

> What I mean is that there is no alternative to "le se broda" if
> you want to get at the ur-x2 of broda.

I don't see what can be wrong with "se broda".

How can you get shorter than a monosyllabic cmavo + the bridi?

(Short of maybe allocating some monosyllabic cmavo to be combinations of
"le+SE", which would be silly.)

- Jay Kominek <[email-masked]>
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose