From jay.kominek@colorado.edu Tue Oct 30 14:42:10 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 30 Oct 2001 22:42:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 56259 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2001 22:42:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by 10.1.1.223 with QMQP; 30 Oct 2001 22:42:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucsub.colorado.edu) (128.138.129.12) by mta2 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2001 22:42:09 -0000 Received: from ucsub.colorado.edu (kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu [128.138.129.12]) by ucsub.colorado.edu (8.11.6/8.11.2/ITS-5.0/student) with ESMTP id f9UMg9w22110 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 15:42:09 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 15:42:09 -0700 (MST) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] SE--FA interaction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE From: Jay Kominek X-Yahoo-Profile: jfkominek On Tue, 30 Oct 2001 pycyn@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 10/30/2001 3:54:34 PM Central Standard Time, > jay.kominek@colorado.edu writes: > > > I don't see what can be wrong with "se broda". > > > > How can you get shorter than a monosyllabic cmavo + the bridi? > > > > (Short of maybe allocating some monosyllabic cmavo to be combinations o= f > > "le+SE", which would be silly.) > > You need to check back the whole thread: And's remark was to my question > about why not just use FA if you don't like shifted places with SE. I did read the whole thing. >From where I sat, it looked like: And: I don't like SE. pycyn: So use FA instead. And: Nono, I don't like SE in sumti tails. Jay: {broda be fo do} is a perfectly fine sumti tail. And: Nono, I meant using SE to make a sumti from the x2 of broda. Jay: Oh. How do you get any shorter than a monosyllabic cmavo? (warning: simplification not intended to belittle arguments) Care to enlighten me as to what I missed? - Jay Kominek Plus =C3=A7a change, plus c'est la m=C3=AAme chose