From phma@oltronics.net Tue Oct 30 20:31:45 2001
Return-Path: <phma@ixazon.dynip.com>
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 31 Oct 2001 04:31:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 74196 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2001 04:31:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 31 Oct 2001 04:31:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (216.189.29.241)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 31 Oct 2001 04:31:33 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500)
  id 907BD3C478; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:50:33 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] a construal of lo'e & le'e
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:50:32 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <F62E9ql2RkeS8YkdavN0000039b@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F62E9ql2RkeS8YkdavN0000039b@hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01103020503212.01133@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>

On Tuesday 30 October 2001 18:54, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> {re lo'e kanla} doesn't make sense, there is only one {lo'e kanla}.

le kanla be lo'e remna are, of course, lo'e zunle kanla and lo'e pritu kanla. 
So, xu lo'e zunle kanla cu me lo'e kanla?

mi'e pier.