From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Wed Oct 31 04:53:07 2001
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 31 Oct 2001 12:53:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 63838 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2001 12:53:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by 10.1.1.221 with QMQP; 31 Oct 2001 12:53:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 31 Oct 2001 12:53:01 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
  Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:29:38 +0000
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
  with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:04:12 +0000
Message-Id: <sbdff6cc.059@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:03:44 +0000
To: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] SE--FA interaction
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

I'm not saying it's a problem. I'm saying that sometimes its unavoidable th=
at FA-tags do not always correspond to ur-places. For example, the fa-tagge=
d sumti of tavla does not always indicate the talker. PC had seemed to say =
that if one thought that a problem it was avoidable.=20

--And.

>>> Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org> 10/30/01 09:03pm >>>
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, And Rosta wrote:

> What I mean is that there is no alternative to "le se broda" if
> you want to get at the ur-x2 of broda.



Why is this a problem?




--=20
"You can not stop us. We have this anthrax. You die now. Are you afraid?
Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great."





To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com=20

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/=20




