From jcowan@reutershealth.com Wed Oct 31 06:00:41 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 31 Oct 2001 14:00:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 42357 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2001 14:00:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.1.223 with QMQP; 31 Oct 2001 14:00:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36) by mta1 with SMTP; 31 Oct 2001 14:00:37 -0000 Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[192.168.3.11]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA16417; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 09:01:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3BE0046F.3090604@reutershealth.com> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 09:02:23 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011012 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: And Rosta Cc: jjllambias , lojban Subject: Re: [lojban] a construal of lo'e & le'e References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Cowan X-Yahoo-Profile: john_w_cowan And Rosta wrote: >>>>Jorge Llambias 10/30/01 11:54pm >>> >>>> > #Could {zo'e} be defined perhaps as {lo'e du}? > > Surely lo'e du treats everything as one single Mr Everything. No, that would require a one-place predicate that is true of everything. "lo'e du" means "lo'e du zo'e", Mr. Whatyouhadinmind. -- Not to perambulate || John Cowan the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel