From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Wed Oct 31 07:58:09 2001
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 31 Oct 2001 15:58:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 57147 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2001 15:57:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 31 Oct 2001 15:57:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 31 Oct 2001 15:57:58 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
  Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:34:28 +0000
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
  with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:09:00 +0000
Message-Id: <sbe0221c.049@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:08:38 +0000
To: pycyn <pycyn@aol.com>, lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [lojban] RE: SE-FA
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

>>> <pycyn@aol.com> 10/31/01 01:20am >>>
#And:
#<Speaking of word-order,another thing I wish for is a SE converter
#that moves a nonx1 to x1 and then shuffles all other places along
#one. I find I need that more often than standard SE conversion.>
#
#It is easy to create one for each place, though I have never had occasion =
to=20
#use one or see one used. They are complex, of course, unless taken as unit=
s.=20=20
#Which of the possible interpretations of your description do you prefer? =
I=20
#suppose you mean (for 3) 31245, i.e. setesete (I think). If you want this=
=20
#reordering to start from the shifted number and then get round to 1ff at t=
he=20
#end (34512), that is different, texeseve.=20=20

I had in mind 31245. Which is setese =3D tesete. I find that even with one
SE conversion I have to concentrate to remember the resulting place
order (se is okay, but te/ve/xe are harder), and that with two SE I have
to resort to working it out on a piece of paper. So anyway, yes, learning
"setese" as a unit might in the end be the simplest option. I have in=20
fact used setese, but I don't think it's fair to inflict it on people; unle=
ss
they've learnt it as a unit, which they won't have, because nobody
else uses it, they'll have to spend two minutes working it out.

--And.