From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Wed Oct 31 08:06:32 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 31 Oct 2001 16:06:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 44955 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2001 16:06:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.1.220 with QMQP; 31 Oct 2001 16:06:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3) by mta1 with SMTP; 31 Oct 2001 16:06:23 -0000 Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer); Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:42:55 +0000 Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:17:26 +0000 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:16:51 +0000 To: jcowan Cc: jjllambias , lojban Subject: Re: [lojban] a construal of lo'e & le'e Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline From: And Rosta X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin Oh. Right. I see. Yes then. Sorry: I agree with you both. --And. >>> John Cowan 10/31/01 02:02pm >>> And Rosta wrote: >>>>Jorge Llambias 10/30/01 11:54pm >>> >>>> > #Could {zo'e} be defined perhaps as {lo'e du}? >=20 > Surely lo'e du treats everything as one single Mr Everything. No, that would require a one-place predicate that is true of everything. "lo'e du" means "lo'e du zo'e", Mr. Whatyouhadinmind. --=20 Not to perambulate || John Cowan the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com=20 during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan=20 in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel