Subject: Re: [lojban] a construal of lo'e & le'e

From: [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 04:32:05 EST

In a message dated 10/31/2001 11:14:42 AM Central Standard Time, 
[email-masked] writes:

> I don't see a problem with 
> "re da kanla lo'e remna". Abstract away to a conceptual
> realm where there is just Mr Human (some thinkers may
> already be in that realm, of course), and check through
> everything in the universe to find whether there are
> exactly two things that be-eye him [sorry for sexism].
> And so there are.
> 

Well, except that there aren't in the universe that contains only Mr. Human, 
because then He (ditto) id the instantiation of all bound variables and he is 
not an eye. You do have to be careful in these ontologies.