From rob@twcny.rr.com Thu Nov 01 15:47:22 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 1 Nov 2001 23:47:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 52705 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2001 23:47:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.1.220 with QMQP; 1 Nov 2001 23:47:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailout5.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.169) by mta1 with SMTP; 1 Nov 2001 23:47:20 -0000 Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-1 [24.92.226.139]) by mailout5.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/Road Runner 1.12) with ESMTP id fA1NlHh06890 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 18:47:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from riff ([24.92.246.4]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 18:47:15 -0500 Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15zRXX-0000KB-00 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2001 18:46:27 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 18:46:26 -0500 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: countability (was: RE: [lojban] a construal of lo'e & le'e Message-ID: <20011101184626.B1063@twcny.rr.com> Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com References: <3BE1A154.4080603@reutershealth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com From: Rob Speer X-Yahoo-Profile: squeekybobo On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 04:48:25PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > Has this discussion yet given me practical, uncontroversial advice on when > to use which gadri? Well, due to this discussion I plan to use {pa} in place of {lo} more often. It's the same number of syllables and eliminates lots of vagueness. -- la rab.spir noi sarji zo gumri