From rob@twcny.rr.com Thu Nov 01 18:59:57 2001
Return-Path: <rob@twcny.rr.com>
X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 2 Nov 2001 02:59:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 5161 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2001 02:59:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172)
  by m10.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Nov 2001 02:59:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailout6.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.177)
  by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Nov 2001 02:59:56 -0000
Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-1 [24.92.226.139])
  by mailout6.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/Road Runner 1.12) with ESMTP id fA22xtF03908
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 21:59:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from riff ([24.92.246.4]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com
  (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223
  ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 21:59:51 -0500
Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
  id 15zUXv-0000S7-00
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 01 Nov 2001 21:59:03 -0500
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 21:59:03 -0500
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] updated gismu list
Message-ID: <20011101215903.A1683@twcny.rr.com>
Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com
References: <20011101150932.G23912@digitalkingdom.org> <20011101192250.C1063@twcny.rr.com> <20011101162553.C8020@digitalkingdom.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20011101162553.C8020@digitalkingdom.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i
X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com
From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
X-Yahoo-Profile: squeekybobo

On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 04:25:53PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> That's correct, compounds were not counted.
> 
> It was a gismu list count anyways.

If you think cmavo should not be counted, they should be in a separate
section of the list and not sorted with the rest.

However, I think it would be useful to know how often the cmavo which
are considered important enough to be in the gismu list are used.

Also, if the previous data on frequency only involved mailing list
messages, I think it should be disregarded; frequency in actual text is
much more important.

--
la rab.spir
noi sarji zo gumri


