Subject: Re: [lojban] lo with discourse-scope?

From: Rob Speer <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 15:57:31 -0500

On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 09:26:08AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> Uhhh, doesn't da keep its binding until changed?

According to recent discussion (and this dismays me greatly) {da} loses
its binding at the next bare {.i}!

I certainly don't remember that from the book - in fact, I seem to
remember a special rule that {da}-variables are cleared at {ni'o}.

-- 
la rab.spir
noi sarji zo gumri