From rob@twcny.rr.com Fri Nov 02 13:07:20 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 2 Nov 2001 21:07:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 33570 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2001 21:07:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m12.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Nov 2001 21:07:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailout5.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.122) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Nov 2001 21:07:19 -0000 Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-1 [24.92.226.139]) by mailout5.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/Road Runner 1.12) with ESMTP id fA2L7Gh04844 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 16:07:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from riff ([24.92.246.4]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 16:07:16 -0500 Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15zlWF-0000Jo-00 for ; Fri, 02 Nov 2001 16:06:27 -0500 Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 16:06:27 -0500 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] lo with discourse-scope? Message-ID: <20011102160627.E879@twcny.rr.com> Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com References: <20011102155731.C879@twcny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com From: Rob Speer X-Yahoo-Profile: squeekybobo On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 03:59:53PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Rob Speer wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 09:26:08AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > Uhhh, doesn't da keep its binding until changed? > > > > According to recent discussion (and this dismays me greatly) {da} loses > > its binding at the next bare {.i}! > > > If that were the case there would hardly be a need for da'o. Precisely. Hence I was wondering why there wasn't more of an outcry when (against all probability) PC and And both agreed about that. -- .i da poi la rab.spir .i da sarji zo gumri