From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Fri Nov 02 13:18:35 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 2 Nov 2001 21:18:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 30753 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2001 21:18:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m10.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Nov 2001 21:18:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.169.75.101) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Nov 2001 21:18:33 -0000 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15zli6-0002En-00 for ; Fri, 02 Nov 2001 13:18:42 -0800 Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:18:42 -0800 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] lo with discourse-scope? Message-ID: <20011102131841.D5796@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: <20011102092608.K8020@digitalkingdom.org> <20011102155731.C879@twcny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011102155731.C879@twcny.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i From: Robin Lee Powell X-Yahoo-Profile: robinleepowell On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 03:57:31PM -0500, Rob Speer wrote: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 09:26:08AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Uhhh, doesn't da keep its binding until changed? > > According to recent discussion (and this dismays me greatly) {da} loses > its binding at the next bare {.i}! That's patently ridiculous. lu da cu mulna'u .i da zmadu li reno li'u lu ta'a .i .uanai xu da pe de'u mulna'u li'u lu .o'ocu'i mi puzi cusku le du'u go'i li'u lu .uanaisai ku'i do puba co'a cusku lo cnino jufra li'u This makes da utterly and totally pointless. I will not use it in this fashion. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/