Subject: Re: [lojban] lo with discourse-scope?

From: Robin Lee Powell <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:18:42 -0800

On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 03:57:31PM -0500, Rob Speer wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 09:26:08AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > Uhhh, doesn't da keep its binding until changed?
> 
> According to recent discussion (and this dismays me greatly) {da} loses
> its binding at the next bare {.i}!

That's patently ridiculous.

lu da cu mulna'u .i da zmadu li reno li'u

lu ta'a .i .uanai xu da pe de'u mulna'u li'u

lu .o'ocu'i mi puzi cusku le du'u go'i li'u

lu .uanaisai ku'i do puba co'a cusku lo cnino jufra li'u

This makes da utterly and totally pointless. I will not use it in this
fashion.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno
je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/