Subject: Re: [lojban] lo with discourse-scope?

From: Invent Yourself <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 16:22:09 -0500 (EST)

On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Rob Speer wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 03:59:53PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Rob Speer wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 09:26:08AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > > > Uhhh, doesn't da keep its binding until changed?
> > >
> > > According to recent discussion (and this dismays me greatly) {da} loses
> > > its binding at the next bare {.i}!
> >
> >
> > If that were the case there would hardly be a need for da'o.
>
> Precisely. Hence I was wondering why there wasn't more of an outcry when
> (against all probability) PC and And both agreed about that.

I guess nobody was paying attention. But a cabal of non-users cannot
eviscerate my da so easily.

-- 
"You can not stop us. We have this anthrax. You die now. Are you afraid?
Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great."