Subject: Re: [lojban] lo with discourse-scope?

From: Rob Speer <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 17:02:15 -0500

On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 04:53:08PM -0500, [email-masked] wrote:
> In a message dated 11/2/2001 11:36:03 AM Central Standard Time, 
> [email-masked] writes:
> 
> 
> > Uhhh, doesn't da keep its binding until changed?
> > 
> > That's certainly how I use it.
> > 
> 
> Once more (with feeling): Officially, the scope of {da} (its binding) runs 
> out at the next unadorned {i} or similar break marker or at {da'o}, whichever 
> comes first.

If this is official, show us where it is in the Book and/or in Lojban usage.

Furthermore, if this is official, why was da'o created?

Is this as official as your "Record" on the new, improved, utterly
broken {ce'u}?

-- 
la rab.spir
noi sarji zo gumri