From pycyn@aol.com Sat Nov 03 06:30:23 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 3 Nov 2001 14:30:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 54556 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2001 14:30:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Nov 2001 14:30:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r03.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.99) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Nov 2001 14:30:22 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.8.) id r.c0.1d20c636 (3845) for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 09:30:11 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 09:30:17 EST Subject: Re: [lojban] lo with discourse-scope? To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_c0.1d20c636.29155979_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra --part1_c0.1d20c636.29155979_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 11/2/2001 4:06:09 PM Central Standard Time, rob@twcny.rr.com writes: > Is this as official as your "Record" on the new, improved, utterly > broken {ce'u}? > Never did get to a record, onlystabs at one. And this is much more official -- in the Refgram (and a couple of Records too, I think): 16.14 --part1_c0.1d20c636.29155979_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 11/2/2001 4:06:09 PM Central Standard Time, rob@twcny.rr.com writes:


Is this as official as your "Record" on the new, improved, utterly
broken {ce'u}?

Never did get to a record, onlystabs at one.  And this is much more official -- in the Refgram (and a couple of Records too, I think): 16.14
--part1_c0.1d20c636.29155979_boundary--