From pycyn@aol.com Sun Nov 04 05:58:52 2001
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 4 Nov 2001 13:58:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 67558 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2001 13:58:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171)
  by m12.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Nov 2001 13:58:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m09.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.164)
  by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Nov 2001 13:58:51 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-m09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.8.) id r.16e.35fa3b4 (18254)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 08:58:49 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <16e.35fa3b4.2916a399@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 08:58:49 EST
Subject: Re: [lojban] lo with discourse-scope?
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_16e.35fa3b4.2916a399_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535
From: pycyn@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra

--part1_16e.35fa3b4.2916a399_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 11/3/2001 9:38:51 PM Central Standard Time, 
a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes:


> a proper
> well-behaved quantifier-bound variable is not pointless, and it is
> good for us to have such a thing, even if it can't be da & we have to
> have an experimental cmavo for it instead.
> 

Well, {da} is proper and well-behaved; its user are sometimes not. We let 
them get away with it colloquially, but call them to heel when precision is 
an issue.

--part1_16e.35fa3b4.2916a399_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 11/3/2001 9:38:51 PM Central Standard Time, a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">a proper
<BR>well-behaved quantifier-bound variable is not pointless, and it is
<BR>good for us to have such a thing, even if it can't be da &amp; we have to
<BR>have an experimental cmavo for it instead.
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>Well, {da} is proper and well-behaved; its user are sometimes not. &nbsp;We let them get away with it colloquially, but call them to heel when precision is an issue.</FONT></HTML>

--part1_16e.35fa3b4.2916a399_boundary--

