From phma@oltronics.net Tue Nov 06 04:45:55 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 6 Nov 2001 12:45:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 36980 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2001 12:45:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 6 Nov 2001 12:45:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (216.189.29.232) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2001 12:45:48 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id C82393C56F; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 07:34:12 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [lojban-beginners] vanbi vs. vanci Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 07:34:09 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <20011106120159.P23326@bapli> In-Reply-To: <20011106120159.P23326@bapli> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0111060734091D.01045@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat On Tuesday 06 November 2001 07:01, John Leuner wrote: > [crossposted] > > There seem to be mistakes in the lujvo list. > > vanbi is used for vanci in quite a few places. > > Who is responsible for making changes to the list and updating the > 'official' list? There's a page on the Wiki for this. http://nuzban.wiw.org/wiki/index.php?Lujvo%20list%20errata phma