From bloke_without_a_favourite_colour@yahoo.co.uk Sat Nov 10 01:05:10 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: bloke_without_a_favourite_colour@yahoo.co.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 10 Nov 2001 09:05:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 63268 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2001 09:05:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m12.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Nov 2001 09:05:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n12.groups.yahoo.com) (216.115.96.62) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Nov 2001 09:05:09 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: bloke_without_a_favourite_colour@yahoo.co.uk Received: from [10.1.10.101] by n12.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Nov 2001 09:05:09 -0000 Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 09:05:05 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Language of Logic and Logical Language. Message-ID: <9siqk1+71nh@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 350 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 62.64.191.187 From: bloke_without_a_favourite_colour@yahoo.co.uk X-Yahoo-Profile: bloke_without_a_favourite_colour --- In lojban@y..., "Jorge Llambias" wrote: > > (I find the mythical > claim that Lojban does not have an obligatory singular-plural > distinction very misleading, when not properly explained.) Would you mind elaborating on this? How does Lojban have an obligatory singular-plural distinction? Sincerely, Robert