From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sat Nov 10 09:38:54 2001
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 10 Nov 2001 17:38:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 81017 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2001 17:38:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171)
  by m8.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Nov 2001 17:38:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.75)
  by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Nov 2001 17:38:54 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
  Sat, 10 Nov 2001 09:38:54 -0800
Received: from 200.69.11.141 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
  Sat, 10 Nov 2001 17:38:53 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [200.69.11.141]
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Bcc: 
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Language of Logic and Logical Language.
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 17:38:53 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F75c00goZolmRBaYFku000014f7@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2001 17:38:54.0057 (UTC) FILETIME=[91293D90:01C16A0E]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000


le nanmu poi claxu lo'e selnelrai skari cu cusku di'e

>Would you mind elaborating on this? How does Lojban have an
>obligatory singular-plural distinction?

The usual claim is that Lojban doesn't have obligatory
tense and number. This is true enough for tense. You have
but to look at any Lojban text and chances are that most
sentences won't be marked by tense. Tense is not obligatory
and it is very easy to avoid. But when it comes to number...
First, you cannot avoid having to choose an article/quantifier
for most sumti. This choice is extremely intertwined with
the singular-plural distinction. Then {le} and {lei} are the
only gadri for which the singular-plural distinction could be
avoided. But look at any Lojban text and try to find a bare
{le broda} that refers to more than one broda, or a {lei broda}
that refers to a single broda. You won't find them easily.
So my contention is that to put on the same level non-obligatory
tense in Lojban with non-obligatory number is misleading.

mu'o mi'e xorxes



_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


