From a.rosta@ntlworld.com Sat Nov 10 15:48:11 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@ntlworld.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 10 Nov 2001 23:48:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 25759 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2001 23:48:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171)
  by m5.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Nov 2001 23:48:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta02-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.42)
  by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Nov 2001 23:48:11 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.255.40.125]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com
  (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP
  id <20011110234719.FZM4462.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew>
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sat, 10 Nov 2001 23:47:19 +0000
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: bases [was: Re: [lojban] Re:HEX advert... (Don't know what it was)
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 23:46:37 -0000
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMGEJNEPAA.a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <9sjfeg+c77v@eGroups.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

Bloke Without A Favourite Colour:
> --- In lojban@y..., And Rosta <arosta@u...> wrote:
> > I could point out, btw, that by your reasoning it could be argued 
> that
> > English is default base 13, given that digits 1-12 are 
> noncompositional.
> 
> Just because English has the words 'ten', 'eleven', and 'twelve' are 
> not respectively 'onety', 'oneteen', and 'twoteen' does not mean 
> English uses base 13 by any stretch, any more than 'thirteen' not 
> being 'threeteen', 'fifteen' not being 'fiveteen', or 'twenty' not 
> being 'twoty' means anything about the base English uses. All these 
> are plainly irregularities.

And, similarly, just because Lojban has noncompositional words for
zero through to 15 does not mean Lojban by default uses base 16.

> > (BTW, I favour duodecimal for cardinal numbers & sexagesimal for
> > fractions.)
> 
> But why?

Convenience of division; it's useful to be able to divide things
into 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 etc neatly & tidily. 60 for fractions because
it is divisible by 5 but not for cardinal numbers because its too
large to do multiplication with.

--And.