From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sun Nov 11 10:20:08 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 11 Nov 2001 18:20:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 75226 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2001 18:20:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Nov 2001 18:20:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.176) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2001 18:20:06 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 10:20:06 -0800 Received: from 200.69.11.64 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 18:20:06 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.69.11.64] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] frants.verf,l.: sticky modal in relative clause(s)? Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 18:20:06 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Nov 2001 18:20:06.0769 (UTC) FILETIME=[7D6CE610:01C16ADD] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la aulun cusku di'e >(...offer for rescue...), dark, subdued, vague, like all offers of that >kind. (He knows that...) >(...te friti lenu terckape sidju...) noi tai ki le'e nunfriti cu manku >zi'enoi xablau zi'enoi nalsatci (.i ki djuno...) > >Do I need to make the modal sticky in order to refer to all (parts of?) the >relative clause(s) joined by {zi'e}? You can sidestep the question by saying: {noi tai le'e nunfriti cu manku gi'e xablau gi'e nalsatci} >If yes, have I to undo stickyness at the beginning of the (normal) >following sentence, or is this unnecessary because it is referring >only to the relative clauses (and there's no more relative clause to >follow)? I don't know, but I guess that if it can jump from one relative clause to another it must also jump to the next sentence. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp