From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sun Nov 11 12:02:40 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 11 Nov 2001 20:02:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 13368 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2001 20:02:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Nov 2001 20:02:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.212) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2001 20:02:40 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 12:02:40 -0800 Received: from 200.69.11.151 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 20:02:40 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.69.11.151] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: frants.verf,l.: sticky modal in relative clause(s)? Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 20:02:40 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Nov 2001 20:02:40.0369 (UTC) FILETIME=[D141BE10:01C16AEB] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la aulun cusku di'e >My previous version was {noi manku gi'e xablau gi'e nalsatci tai le'e >nunfriti}, but then regarded {gi'e} as not allowed in relative >clauses (what I really would have preferred in contrast to lengthy >{zi'enoi}). Couldn't find hints in Woldy. There is no problem with {gi'e} in relative clauses. However, the way you have it, {tai le'e nunfriti} is a term of only the third selbri. To have it apply to all three you have to either put it in front or else precede it with {vau vau}. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp