Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: frants.verf,l.: sticky modal in relative clause(s)?

From: "Jorge Llambias" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 20:02:40

la aulun cusku di'e

>My previous version was {noi manku gi'e xablau gi'e nalsatci tai le'e 
>nunfriti}, but then regarded {gi'e} as not allowed in relative
>clauses (what I really would have preferred in contrast to lengthy 
>{zi'enoi}). Couldn't find hints in Woldy.

There is no problem with {gi'e} in relative clauses.

However, the way you have it, {tai le'e nunfriti} is a term
of only the third selbri. To have it apply to all three you
have to either put it in front or else precede it with {vau vau}.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp