From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Tue Nov 13 06:47:39 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 13 Nov 2001 14:47:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 3169 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2001 14:47:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m6.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Nov 2001 14:47:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Nov 2001 14:47:37 -0000 Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer); Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:23:41 +0000 Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:59:35 +0000 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:58:57 +0000 To: lojban Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Introduction, and zutse/se sutse Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline From: And Rosta X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin Rob: #On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 11:40:48PM -0000, thinkit8@lycos.com wrote: #> what do you think about the movement to use hexadecimal as the=20 #> default lojban base? # #Hardly a "movement" if it's only got one person in it. Remind me, why #didn't you go off and use that other language which does have hex as a #default? Claudio didn't invent Liva for it to be actually *used*. It is purely a log= lang design. #Personally, I'm wondering why bloke_without_a_name is suddenly digging #up all these threads which have been mercifully dead and buried for #weeks if not months, and which have very little to do with Lojban. I had thought that bloke_without_a_name was Tinkit's new monicker, because didn't he say some time ago he was going to go away and return with a new identity? Robin CA calls himself cmeclax, but that's probably coincidence. --And.