From cmeclax@gmx.co.uk Tue Nov 13 09:32:11 2001
Return-Path: <cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com>
X-Sender: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 13 Nov 2001 17:32:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 92754 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2001 17:32:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171)
  by m2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Nov 2001 17:32:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (216.189.29.227)
  by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Nov 2001 17:32:02 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 504)
  id 9451A3C98A; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:16:36 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Reply-To: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: normal vs average
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:16:29 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
Comment: li 0x6E5F017970D41E6AECE3B3860444EBC548C0C651 cu sevzi le mi ckiku
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01111309162900.22785@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com
From: cmeclax po'u le cmevi'u ke'umri <cmeclax@gmx.co.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

How do we distinguish normal (as opposed to abnormal, which indicates 
something's wrong) from average (mean, median, mode)? Which is cnano? My 
average reliability figures, because of floods, have recently been quite 
abnormal!

cmeclax
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE78StCBETrxUjAxlERArEbAKCdNfsOzDdrohacGd4gcD3wUAecpwCfW8Yh
qGQKZhw6r9hRS7ro3YjRqm4=
=Dqbj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----