From cowan@ccil.org Tue Nov 13 18:11:23 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 14 Nov 2001 02:11:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 36098 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2001 02:11:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m6.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Nov 2001 02:11:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2001 02:11:23 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 163pWX-0003RU-00 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 21:11:33 -0500 Subject: Re: [lojban] Why is there so much irregularity in cmavo/gismu? In-Reply-To: from Craig at "Nov 13, 2001 05:43:42 pm" To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 21:11:33 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-eGroups-From: John Cowan From: John Cowan X-Yahoo-Profile: johnwcowan Craig scripsit: > I also don't think that lerfu should be a seperate cmavo when the most > common use is as pro-sumti - which should put them in KOhA. The difference is fundamental. "ko'a ko'e ko'i" is three sumti, but "by. cy. dy." is only one. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan