Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: ca'a pu (was: Why is there so much irregularity in cmavo/gismu?)

From: Jay Kominek <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 07:33:06 -0700 (MST)

On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, John Cowan wrote:

> Jay Kominek wrote:
>
> > {mi ca'a pu broda} does not work.
>
> If so, that is a bug: ku is not required after a free-standing
> modal (unlike after "na"), so ca'a pu is just ca'a[ku] pu.

Being a bit more awake this morning, I thought to check the official
parser. {mi ca'a pu broda} does indeed work with it, and it does insert
that [ku].

So, it is a jbofi'e bug then, I suppose. (Just tested jbofi'e 0.38, it
doesn't work, either)

- Jay Kominek <[email-masked]>
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose