From jay.kominek@colorado.edu Wed Nov 14 06:34:06 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 14 Nov 2001 14:34:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 96772 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2001 14:34:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m6.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Nov 2001 14:34:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucsub.colorado.edu) (128.138.129.12) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2001 14:34:05 -0000 Received: from ucsub.colorado.edu (kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu [128.138.129.12]) by ucsub.colorado.edu (8.11.6/8.11.2/ITS-5.0/student) with ESMTP id fAEEX6715590; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 07:33:06 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 07:33:06 -0700 (MST) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Cc: jbofihe@go.to Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: ca'a pu (was: Why is there so much irregularity in cmavo/gismu?) In-Reply-To: <3BF274A8.2070903@reutershealth.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE From: Jay Kominek X-Yahoo-Profile: jfkominek On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, John Cowan wrote: > Jay Kominek wrote: > > > {mi ca'a pu broda} does not work. > > If so, that is a bug: ku is not required after a free-standing > modal (unlike after "na"), so ca'a pu is just ca'a[ku] pu. Being a bit more awake this morning, I thought to check the official parser. {mi ca'a pu broda} does indeed work with it, and it does insert that [ku]. So, it is a jbofi'e bug then, I suppose. (Just tested jbofi'e 0.38, it doesn't work, either) - Jay Kominek Plus =C3=A7a change, plus c'est la m=C3=AAme chose