From xod@sixgirls.org Wed Nov 14 09:39:54 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 14 Nov 2001 17:39:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 76750 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2001 17:39:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m5.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Nov 2001 17:39:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (216.27.131.50) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2001 17:39:51 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fAEHdpp17702 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:39:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:39:50 -0500 (EST) To: lojban Subject: Re: ka'e (was: Re: [lojban] Introduction, and zutse/se sutse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, And Rosta wrote: > >>> Invent Yourself 11/14/01 05:21pm >>> > #On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, And Rosta wrote: > #> 2. The "innately capable of" is open to the objection raised by Jorge -- > #> that it wrongly privileges one sumti. > # > #Not so fast. Which sumti is wrongly privileged in "ka'e klama da"? > > The goer. I assume on the basis of canonical examples that it is the > goer that is innately capable of going somewhere. .ienai .i le selkla po'o cu selsnu .i ku'i le mulno ckini cu cumki .i ko lanli "mi pu klama" .i le mulno ckini cu purci -- I hope they confuse the two and toss away the lit flare while holding the lit dynamite stick as a statue of Liberty Torch. That would make my day- for at least a 1/4 hour. -- Fernando