From xod@sixgirls.org Wed Nov 14 10:17:39 2001
Return-Path: <xod@reva.sixgirls.org>
X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 14 Nov 2001 18:17:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 12965 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2001 18:17:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171)
  by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Nov 2001 18:17:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (216.27.131.50)
  by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2001 18:17:39 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
  by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fAEIHcH18362
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 13:17:38 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 13:17:37 -0500 (EST)
To: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: ka'e (was: Re: [lojban] Introduction, and zutse/se sutse
In-Reply-To: <sbf2b6f4.018@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0111141314140.14457-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple

On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, And Rosta wrote:

> >>> Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org> 11/14/01 05:39pm >>>
> #On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, And Rosta wrote:
> #> >>> Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org> 11/14/01 05:21pm >>>
> #> #On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, And Rosta wrote:
> #> #> 2. The "innately capable of" is open to the objection raised by Jorge --
> #> #> that it wrongly privileges one sumti.
> #> #
> #> #Not so fast. Which sumti is wrongly privileged in "ka'e klama da"?
> #>
> #> The goer. I assume on the basis of canonical examples that it is the
> #> goer that is innately capable of going somewhere.
> #
> #.ienai .i le selkla po'o cu selsnu
>
> Not really. Ignoring the ka'e, your sentence says "you-know-what
> goes somewhere from you-know-where via you-know-where...".


pe'i le drata tergismu cu selnibli jena selsnu



> #.i ku'i le mulno ckini cu cumki
> #.i ko lanli "mi pu klama" .i le mulno ckini cu purci
>
> This is correct. ka'e should be similar, hence the objection to
> "innately capable".


.ie .i pe'i na fancu zo pu (noi zo ka'e pagbu ke'a ku'o) le bridi





-- 
I hope they confuse the two and toss away the lit flare while holding
the lit dynamite stick as a statue of Liberty Torch. That would make my
day- for at least a 1/4 hour. -- Fernando




