From lojbab@lojban.org Thu Nov 15 09:47:49 2001
Return-Path: <lojbab@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 15 Nov 2001 17:47:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 35952 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2001 17:47:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171)
  by m12.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 Nov 2001 17:47:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-1.cais.net) (205.252.14.71)
  by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 2001 17:47:48 -0000
Received: from bob.lojban.org (dynamic233.cl8.cais.net [205.177.20.233])
  by stmpy-1.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id fAFHlk775360
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 12:47:46 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20011115124501.052aac30@pop.cais.com>
X-Sender: vir1036@pop.cais.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 12:48:00 -0500
To: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Why is there so much irregularity in cmavo/gismu?
In-Reply-To: <sbf3cc7c.082@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>

At 02:08 PM 11/15/01 +0000, And Rosta wrote:
> >>> Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com> 11/14/01 10:11pm >>>
>#> {xu} really ought to have been
>#> in JAhA (the ja'a/na selmaho), so this is an example of a misplaced
>#>cmavo rather than an example of a totally screwed up selmaho system.
>#
>#If xu were in JAhA, you would need a different word to question a
>#specific part of the sentence (a feature of {xu} which is largely
>#unexplored).
>
>If it makes sense to ask a yes/no question about a specific part of
>the sentence then it also makes sense to affirm or negate a
>specific part of the sentence. Just as xo behaves like a PA and
>ma behaves like a KOhA, so xu should behave like a JAhA.

No, that is an argument for all the JAhA to behave like a UI, except that 
then we would lose the capability for logical negation.

My answer is that the strict question which a JAhA answers is not "xu", but 
ja'axu or naxu, but we interpret sentence scope xu to be the same as ja'axu.

lojbab
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org


