From phma@oltronics.net Fri Nov 16 04:57:08 2001
Return-Path: <phma@ixazon.dynip.com>
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 16 Nov 2001 12:57:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 52081 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2001 12:57:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171)
  by m11.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 Nov 2001 12:57:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (216.189.29.228)
  by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Nov 2001 12:56:57 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500)
  id 8E09E3C718; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 23:41:07 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net
To: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Why is there so much irregularity in cmavo/gismu?
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 23:41:06 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <sbf137cf.042@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <sbf137cf.042@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0111152341060K.03953@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>

On Tuesday 13 November 2001 10:09, And Rosta wrote:
> mukti=mu'i
> mupli=mu'u

Furthermore, some gismu gave rise to more than one cmavo, such as pruce:pu'e 
(sumtcita) and pu'u (sucyvla), or mupli:mu'a (discursive) and mu'u (sumtcita).

phma