From pycyn@aol.com Mon Nov 19 08:17:03 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 19 Nov 2001 16:17:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 32254 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2001 16:17:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 19 Nov 2001 16:17:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r06.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.102) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Nov 2001 16:17:03 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.9.) id r.114.7cc0009 (2615) for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:16:48 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <114.7cc0009.292a8a70@aol.com> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:16:48 EST Subject: Re: [lojban] i want my brain cells back! To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_114.7cc0009.292a8a70_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra --part1_114.7cc0009.292a8a70_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 11/19/2001 6:09:11 AM Central Standard Time, ragnarok@pobox.com writes: > Now that you are "free of lojban", let lojban be free of you. > A sad "Amen." Lojban was not meant to be encvoded English -- indeed, was announced as being as different as possible from English -- so it seems unfortunate that someone got involved whose idea of regularity was the correlation between English concepts and English words (not that that is all that good) and so any differrent language was bound to fail. This is the only way I could find in which Lojban was less regular than English, which was thinkits running claim. --part1_114.7cc0009.292a8a70_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 11/19/2001 6:09:11 AM Central Standard Time, ragnarok@pobox.com writes:


Now that you are "free of lojban", let lojban be free of you.


A sad "Amen."  Lojban was not meant to be encvoded English -- indeed, was announced as being as different as possible from English -- so it seems unfortunate that someone got involved whose idea of regularity was the correlation between English concepts and English words (not that that is all that good) and so any differrent language was bound to fail.  This is the only way I could find in which Lojban was less regular than English, which was thinkits running claim. --part1_114.7cc0009.292a8a70_boundary--