From pycyn@aol.com Sat Nov 24 16:04:50 2001
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 25 Nov 2001 00:04:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 70185 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2001 00:04:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171)
  by m6.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Nov 2001 00:04:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r03.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.99)
  by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 2001 00:04:50 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-r03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.9.) id r.134.5225556 (4068)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 19:04:38 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <134.5225556.29318f9c@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 19:04:44 EST
Subject: Re: [lojban] presentation of lojban
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_134.5225556.29318f9c_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535
From: pycyn@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra

--part1_134.5225556.29318f9c_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 11/24/2001 12:46:00 PM Central Standard Time, 
cowan@ccil.org writes:



> Note the past tense on these questions. I think Craig was asking
> what resources Esperanto had in the year N+12, rather than what
> resources it has now.
> 
> 



The general answer, though not the numbers or titles, of course, would be 
about the same. Esperanto did some of its best work in all areas in the 
first couple of decades.
Not to belabor this point.

--part1_134.5225556.29318f9c_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 11/24/2001 12:46:00 PM Central Standard Time, cowan@ccil.org writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Note the past tense on these questions. &nbsp;I think Craig was asking
<BR>what resources Esperanto had in the year N+12, rather than what
<BR>resources it has now.
<BR>
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>The general answer, though not the numbers or titles, of course, would be about the same. &nbsp;Esperanto did some of its best work in all areas in the first couple of decades.
<BR>Not to belabor this point.</FONT></HTML>

--part1_134.5225556.29318f9c_boundary--

