From xod@sixgirls.org Sat Nov 24 16:39:41 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 25 Nov 2001 00:39:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 75200 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2001 00:39:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Nov 2001 00:39:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (216.27.131.50) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 2001 00:39:41 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fAP0deQ15015 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 19:39:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 19:39:30 -0500 (EST) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban Portal (was: presentation of lojban In-Reply-To: <20011124193715.A1052@twcny.rr.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Rob Speer wrote: > On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 04:15:42AM -0500, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote: > > But on the beginners list, the wiki, and the > > lessons that I did not plan to link to until Nick gave the web-publish > > go-ahead, are really for beginners. > > What harm could come from linking to it? Only small changes have been > made to it recently, and it's so amazingly helpful to beginners that > it makes no sense to hide it from them. It's definitely better than the > _really_ old lessons that lojban.org links to. Are we talking about what Nick has published here: http://ptolemy.tlg.uci.edu/~opoudjis/lojbanbrochure/ -- The tao that can be tar(1)ed is not the entire Tao. The path that can be specified is not the Full Path.